Tuesday, December 17, 2019
The Pearl Resoning - 589 Words
Can Nobel Prize winner in literature, John Steinbeck, creator of legendary novels such as: Of Mice and Men, East of Eden and The Grapes of Wrath, be able to present a novel suitable for the grade nine English curriculum? Sadly the answer is no. The Pearl, written by Steinbeck, offers an awful writing style, a predictable storyline and horrible role models concluding to why it should be removed from the grade nine Engilish curriculum. To start off, the fashion in which the writing is presented is loaded with symbols which have potential in leaving readers such as I confused and set off to what is going on. For instance, Steinbeck’s use of songs to display emotions is unneeded because it makes understanding complicated and raises unnecessary questions on the subject of what its presence serves within the story. In addition to the awful writing style of this novel, The Pearl beholds an annoying and disappointing storyline. It seems that of every page you flip, discluding the find ing of the pearl, Kino’s life becomes more and more miserable and I expected it all to pay off in the ending but the novel left me with disappointment by giving the same negative influence. Steinbeck never seemed to think of his characters as people but as creatures who are buffeted by terrible circumstances. This brings me to my next example, The Pearl has a terrible moral sense. It seems as if the author is trying to say â€Å"do not try to improve it only leads to failure, be happy with where you areâ€
Monday, December 9, 2019
Responsible Consumption free essay sample
Responsible Consumption Angela Green, Laytonia Goodman, Ramona Shuman, Robin Boyette SOC/105 Irma J. Davis-Gibson, Ph. D. August 31, 2010 University of Phoenix Responsible Consumption Mass media has been criticized for not practicing high moral and ethical values (Wilson Wilson, 2001). Electronic media and print media advertise wealth in todays’ society. For example, the media broadcast stories concerning wealthy individuals’ personal lives filled with luxury items. In todays’ society ordinary individuals view wealthy individuals in a different manner because of the mass media. The relationship between media literacy and the responsible consumption of popular culture is unique, because the relationship separates entertainment from reality (Wilson Wilson, 2001). Possessing wealth and power is something that brings an individual much respect in the music industry. When an individual have a certain amount of money, others will more likely do what he or she wants the individuals to do. For example, at the 2009 BET Awards Jay-Z allegedly ‘Blackballed’ Chris Brown. We will write a custom essay sample on Responsible Consumption or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Jay-Z made a public announcement t that if Chris Brown were allowed to attend the award ceremony then he, Rihanna, nor Beyonce would attend the awards ceremony. Jay-Z also declined to perform at the awards ceremony. As a result of Jay-Z’s request Chris Brown did not attend the awards ceremony; however Jay-z, Rihanna, and Beyonce were in attendance. Another example, is at the 2010 BET Awards Chris Brown was permitted to perform and Jay-Z, Rihanna, nor Beyonce were in attendance at the award ceremony. The two scenarios are two examples of how wealth and power rule the music industry. Rihanna is Jay-Z’s artist, and Jay-Z has more wealth and power than Chris Brown has. Wealth is the value of everything that a person or a family owns, minus any debts. Wealth is also the abundance of a valuable resource or material possessions or the control of such assets. The distribution of wealth and power within today’s society will usually affect the opportunities for an individual to achieve his or her highest potential and live a normal life with dignity. Possessing money and fame is not it is portrayed to be. Many individuals believe the lives of he musicians are easy because they are wealthy, popular, and happy. Many musicians have normal lives. Musicians have children and most of all musicians pay bills like most individuals in today’s society do. Many individuals in society believe, if he or she is wealthy he or she automatically has the power to do what he or she wants. Many wealthy individuals believe that they are above the law. Wealthy individuals also believe they can buy their way out of anything. Unfortunately, the rich and wealthy are starting to realize that the world does not revolve around them. They are regular people, and they must function as everyone else in the real-world does. There are many situations of ethical conflict, such as invasion of privacy of wealthy people lives. Movie stars and other celebrities like to keep their lives private. Media, otherwise known as â€Å"paparazzi,†seek out any story that exposes the personal lives of celebrities. Celebrities have problems in their life like everyone in the todays’ society. Exploitation of persons’ lives is very demeaning but seems to attract an audience. For example, if regular people were to have an extra marital affair, would it make the news? For example, Both Jesse James and Tiger Wood’s affair made the news. Ordinary people make the same mistakes as wealthy people do, but the only one’s people discuss is famous people’s mistakes. Why do individuals spend time trying to figure out what a famous person has done or is doing? Todays’ society puts too much energy on what the wealthy and powerful are doing. Not only do individuals invest time and energy into wealthy people’s lives but it is an ethical approach to the consumption of popular culture that can minimize negative consequences. Wealth has much to do with the role of individual responsibility and accountability in responding to popular culture. In todays’ society if you are wealthy or powerful enough you can get away with anything. For example, if a wealthy individual and an ordinary individual commit the same crime, say Driving Under the Influence. The regular person will go to prison for the crime. The wealthy and powerful individual will be all over the news and Internet but will not receive time in jail. The wealthy individual’s money will allow him or her get away with a fine and maybe some community service. The same rules do not apply to everyone. Wealth individuals follow different sets of rules in todays’ society. There is a â€Å"double standard†of laws in todays’ society (Wilson Wilson, 2001). Nevertheless to say there are wealthy people rules and there are ordinary people rules. Media literacy assists in organizing what Americans view on television (Wilson Wilson, 2001). For example, after the live coverage of Super Bowl 38 where Janet Jackson’s bare breast was revealed, the FCC changed the rule on live media to a 15 second delay. Since then, there have still been accidents caught on camera, but fewer to report. The Federal Communications Commission is one of the strategies the government uses to regulate what is seen on television and heard on the radio. Censorship has become more effective in the past few decades where it is needed most. Television, movies, and music are the top forms of media. Although the FCC cannot regulate what shows up in the new movies that come out, they regulate what is shown on television in homes. Cable television system operators generally make their own selection of channels and programs to be distributed to subscribers in response to consumer demands. The Commission does, however, have rules in some areas that are applicable to programming called origination cable casting that is subject to the editorial control of the system operator. †(FCC, 2000) The FCC established ratings for programs that are shown at certain times of the day and the ratings are posted for fifteen seconds before each show starts. These ratings let the family know what type of content is shown in the program and whether or not it is suitable for everyone or not. In conclusion, many individuals confuse obtaining wealth as being a social responsibility because of the portrayal mass media has on wealthy individuals
Sunday, December 1, 2019
Neorealism and its Approach in International Relations an Example of the Topic Government and Law Essays by
Main Features of Neorealism and Weaknesses by Expert Tutor Maya | 04 Nov 2016 Strengths and Weaknesses Essay The amplification of the school of neorealism in the science of international relations occurred at the end of the previous century. The term itself reflects the desire of a number of American theorists of political science to preserve the advantages of the classical tradition and, at the same time, to enrich it, taking into account the new transborder realities and the achievements of other theoretical currents. Kenneth Waltz was the main its developer. Need essay sample on "Main Features of Neorealism and Weaknesses" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed Insisting that in any of its theoretical constructs the researcher of interethnic binding should proceed from the integrity of the world, from the existence of a global system, and not separate realms that are its elements, Waltz makes a certain step towards rapprochement with transnationalism. Defending the main points of political realism (the "natural realm" of transborder binding, the rationality in the actions of the main actors, the national interest as their main motive, the security dilemma, the desire for possession of power), Waltz at the same time criticizes his predecessors for failing to create a theory of interethnic politics as an autonomous discipline. Our Customers Frequently Tell EssayLab writers: I'm not in the mood to write my assignment. But I don't have the time Professional writers advise: Get Your Writing Helper According to Waltz, neorealism begins with the following statement. The theory of transborder relations and world politics is not the same thing. Unlike the canonical realism, neorealism is not inclined to interpret world politics as a kind of total resultant external politicians; it is based on the abstraction of the political sphere from other spheres of interethnic binding. Neorealism abstracts the political sphere from other spheres of transborder relations. In this way, it gets more opportunities both for analyzing the current and for forecasting the expected. Neorealism has its own approach. It studies an interethnic politics as a coherent system functioning in accordance with certain laws. Depending on what causes of conflict researchers consider the main, all studies of transborder binding and, in particular, armed contradiction is compiled into three groups. A person is in the center of the initial one. The representatives of the second group argue that the crucial cause is the style of government in the country. The third group identifies the causes of the systemic property. Waltz believes that, with all their merits, the initial two approaches are reductive and cannot lead to the identification of genuine causes of conflict, and therefore, to help develop ways to prevent or overcome them. Only the third, systemic approach can be fruitful in this respect. At the same time, in the opinion of Kenneth Waltz, the systemic nature of interethnic relations is conditioned not by the cooperating realm actors, it results not from features inherent in the realms, determined by geographical position, demographic potential, socio-cultural specifics, etc. (although the significance of such features should not be denied), but from the properties of the frame of the transborder system. As a consequence of the interaction of interethnic actors, the frame of the transborder system is not reduced to a simple sum but is an independent phenomenon capable of imposing certain restrictions on realms, or, on the contrary, to provide them with favorable opportunities on the world stage. The main thing is that it is the structural features of the interethnic system that explain the discrepancies between goals and results in the foreign policy activity of realms. Nevertheless, the realms behave very similarly in similar transborder situations. Waltz comes to the conclusion that there is a correlation between the foreign policy behavior of realms and the so-called systemic tension. Thus, the main explanation of realm behavior in interaction with other realms is transferred to the level of the interethnic frame. The frame itself is defined as a set of coercive conditions and constraints. Therefore, the proper understanding and, accordingly, the forecasting of transborder politics (as well as the planning of the realm's foreign policy line) depend on the accuracy of determining the totality of these coercions. Waltz limits this set to three elements: the leading principle (the anarchy of interethnic binding), the allotment of the aptitudes of the actors (corresponding to their strength) and the functional differentiation (the differences between subjects regarding internal political views). References Baylis, J, and Smith, S, 2001, The Globalization of World Politics, New York: Oxford University Press Best, A and Hanhimaki, J M, 2008, International History of the Twentieth Century and Beyond,New York: Routledge Brown, M. E, 1998, Theories of war and peace, Massachusetts: MIT Press, Erdem, E. I, 2004, Power and Identity in Flux: American Policy towards the Middle East. Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol.3, No.4, 132-49 Harvey, D ,2005, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York: Oxford University Press Jackson and Sorensen, 2007, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches.New York: Oxford University Press
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Humpty Dumptys Philosophy of Language
Humpty Dumptys Philosophy of Language In Chapter 6 of Through the Looking Glass Alice meets Humpty Dumpty, who she recognizes immediately since she knows about him from the nursery rhyme. Humpty is a bit irritable, but he turns out to have some thought-provoking notions about language, and philosophers of language have been quoting him ever since. Must a Name Have a Meaning? Humpty begins by asking Alice her name and her business:            ‘My name is Alice, but––‘           ‘It’s a stupid name enough!’ Humpty Dumpty interrupted impatiently. ‘What does it mean?’           ‘Must a name mean something?’ Alice asked doubtfully.           ‘Of course it must,’ Humpty Dumpty said with a short laugh: ‘my name means the shape I am–and a good handsome shape it is too. With a name like yours, you might be any shape, almost.’ As in many other respects, the looking glass world, at least as described by Humpty Dumpty, is the inverse of Alice’s everyday world (which is also ours). In the everyday world, names typically have little or no meaning: ‘Alice,’ ‘Emily,’ ‘Jamal,’ ‘Christiano,’ usually do nothing other than denoting an individual. They can certainly have connotations: that’s why there are so many more people called ‘David’ (the heroic king of ancient Israel) than are called ‘Judas’ (the betrayer of Jesus). And we can sometimes infer (though not with perfect certainty) incidental acts about a person from their name: e.g. their sex, their religion (or that of their parents), or their nationality. But names usually tell us little else about their bearers. From the fact that someone is called ‘Grace,’ we can’t infer that they are graceful. Apart from the fact that most proper names are gendered, so parents don’t usually call a boy ‘Josephine’ or a girl ‘William,’ a person can be given pretty much any name from a very long list. General terms, on the other hand, cannot be applied arbitrarily. The word ‘tree’ can’t be applied to an egg; and the word ‘egg’ can’t mean a tree. That is because words like these, unlike proper names, have a definite meaning. But in Humpty Dumpty’s world, things are the other way round. Proper names must have a meaning, while any ordinary word, as he tells Alice later, means whatever he wants it to mean–that is, he can stick them on things the way we stick names on people. Playing Language Games With Humpty Dumpty Humpty delights in riddles and games. And like many other Lewis Carroll characters, he loves to exploit the difference between the way words are conventionally understood and their literal meaning. Here are a couple of examples.       ‘Why do you sit out here all alone?’ said Alice†¦..           ‘Why, because there’s nobody with me!’ cried Humpty Dumpty. ‘Did you think I didn’t know the answer to that?’ The joke here stems from the ambiguity of the ‘Why?’ question. Alice means ‘What causes have brought it about that you sit here alone?’ This is the normal way the question is understood. Possible answers might be that Humpty dislikes people, or that his friends and neighbors have all gone away for the day. But he takes the question in a different sense, as asking something like: under what circumstances would we say that you (or anyone) are alone? Since his answer rests on nothing more than the definition of the word ‘alone,’ it is completely uninformative, which is what makes it funny. A second example needs no analysis.            ‘So here’s a question for you{says Humpty]. How old did you say you were?           Alice made a short calculation, and said ‘Seven years and six months.’           ‘Wrong!’ Humpty Dumpty exclaimed triumphantly. You never said a word like it.’           ‘I thought you meant â€Å"How old are you?†’ Alice explained.           ‘If I’d meant that, I’d have said it,’ said Humpty Dumpty. How Do Words Get Their Meaning? The following exchange between Alice and Humpty Dumpty has been cited countless times by philosophers of language:            ‘†¦and that shows that there are three hundred and sixty-four days when you might get un-birthday presents––‘           ‘Certainly,’ said Alice.           ‘And only one for birthday presents, you know. There’s glory for you!’                 ‘I don’t know what you mean by â€Å"glory†,’ Alice said.           ‘Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. ‘Of course you don’t–till I tell you. I meant â€Å"there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!†’           ‘But â€Å"glory†doesn’t mean â€Å"a nice knock-down argument†, Alice objected.           †˜When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean–neither more nor less.’           ‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean different things–that’s all.’           ‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master–that’s all’ In his Philosophical Investigations (published in 1953), Ludwig Wittgenstein argues against the idea of a â€Å"private language.†Language, he maintains, is essentially social, and words get their meanings from the way they are used by communities of language users. If he is right, and most philosophers think he is, then Humpty’s claim that he can decide for himself what words mean, is wrong. Of course, a small group of people, even just two people, could decide to give words novel meanings. E.g. Two children could invent a code according to which â€Å"sheep†means â€Å"ice cream†and â€Å"fish†means money. But in that case, it is still possible for one of them to misuse a word and for the other speaker to point out the mistake. But if I alone decide what words mean, it becomes impossible to identify mistaken uses. This is Humpty’s situation if words simply mean whatever he wants them to mean. So Alice’s skepticism about Humpty’s ability to decide for himself what words mean is well-founded. But Humpty’s response is interesting. He says it comes down to ‘which is to be master.’ Presumably, he means: are we to master language, or is language to master us? This is a profound and complex question. On the one hand, language is a human creation: we didn’t find it lying around, ready-made. On the other hand, each of us is born into a linguistic world and a linguistic community which, whether we like it or not, provides us with our basic conceptual categories, and shapes the way we perceive the world. Language is certainly a tool that we use for our purposes; but it is also, to use a familiar metaphor, like a house in which we live.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
The Root Causes of the American Revolution
The Root Causes of the American Revolution The American Revolution began in 1775 as an open conflict between the United Thirteen Colonies and Great Britain. Many factors played a role in the colonists desires to fight for their independence. Not only did these issues lead to war, but they also shaped the foundation of the United States of America. The Cause of the American Revolution No single event caused the revolution. It was, instead, a series of events that led to the war. Essentially, it began as a disagreement over the way Great Britain governed the colonies and the way the colonies thought they should be treated. Americans felt they deserved all the rights of Englishmen. The British, on the other hand, thought that the colonies were created to be used in ways that best suited the Crown and Parliament. This conflict is embodied in one of the rallying cries of the ​American Revolution: No Taxation Without Representation. Americas Independent Way of Thinking In order to understand what led to the rebellion, its important to look at the mindset of the founding fathers. It should also be noted that this mindset was not that of the majority of colonists: Only about one-third of the colonists supported the rebellion. One-third of the population supported Great Britain, and the other third were neutral. The 18th century is known historically as the age of Enlightenment. It was a period when thinkers, philosophers, statesman, and artists began to question the politics of government, the role of the church, and other fundamental and ethical questions of society as a whole. The period was also known as the Age of Reason, and many colonists followed this new way of thinking. A number of the revolutionary leaders had studied major writings of the Enlightenment including those of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and the Baron de Montesquieu. From these thinkers, the founders gleaned such new political concepts as the social contract, limited government, the consent of the governed, and the separation of powers. Lockes writings, in particular, struck a chord. His books helped to raise questions about the rights of the governed and the overreach of the British government. They spurred the republican ideology that stood up in opposition to those viewed as tyrants. Men such as Benjamin Franklin and John Adams were also influenced by the teachings of the Puritans and Presbyterians. These teachings included such new radical ideas as the principle that all men are created equal and the belief that a king has no divine rights. Together, these innovative ways of thinking led many in this era to consider it their duty to rebel against laws they viewed as unjust. The Freedoms and Restrictions of Location The geography of the colonies also contributed to the revolution. Their distance from Great Britain naturally created a sense of independence that was hard to overcome. Those willing to colonize the new world generally had a strong independent streak with a profound desire for new opportunities and more freedom. The Proclamation of 1763 played its own role. After the French and Indian War, King George III issued the royal decree that prevented further colonization west of the Appalachian Mountains. The intent was to normalize relations with the Native Americans, many of whom fought with the French. A number of settlers had purchased land in the now forbidden area or had received land grants. The crowns proclamation was largely ignored as settlers moved anyway and the Proclamation Line eventually moved after much lobbying. Despite this concession, the affair left another stain on the relationship between the colonies and Britain. The Control of Government The existence of colonial legislatures meant that the colonies were in many ways independent of the crown. The legislatures were allowed to levy taxes, muster troops, and pass laws. Over time, these powers became rights in the eyes of many colonists. The British government had different ideas and attempted to curtail the powers of these newly elected bodies. There were numerous measures designed to ensure the colonial legislatures did not achieve autonomy, although many had nothing to do with the larger British Empire. In the minds of colonists, they were a matter of local concern. From these small, rebellious legislative bodies that represented the colonists, the future leaders of the United States were born. The Economic Troubles Even though the British believed in mercantilism, Prime Minister Robert Walpole espoused a view of salutary neglect. This system was in place from 1607 through 1763, during which the British were lax on enforcement of external trade relations. Walpole believed this enhanced freedom would stimulate commerce. The French and Indian War led to considerable economic trouble for the British government. Its cost was significant, and the British were determined to make up for the lack of funds. They levied new taxes on the colonists and increased trade regulations. These actions were not well received by the colonists. New taxes were enforced, including the Sugar Act and the Currency Act, both in 1764. The Sugar Act increased already considerable taxes on molasses and restricted certain export goods to Britain alone. The Currency Act prohibited the printing of money in the colonies, making businesses rely more on the crippled British economy. Feeling underrepresented, overtaxed, and unable to engage in free trade, the colonists rallied to the slogan, No Taxation Without Representation. This discontent became very apparent in 1773 with the events that later became known as the Boston Tea Party. The Corruption and Control The British governments presence became increasingly more visible in the years leading to the revolution. British officials and soldiers were given more control over the colonists and this led to widespread corruption. Among the most glaring of these issues were the Writs of Assistance. These were general search warrants that gave British soldiers the right to search and seize any property they deemed to be smuggled or illegal goods. Designed to assist the British in enforcing trade laws, these documents allowed British soldiers to enter, search, and seize warehouses, private homes, and ships whenever necessary. However, many abused the power. In 1761, the Boston lawyer James Otis fought for the constitutional rights of the colonists in this matter but lost. The defeat only inflamed the level of defiance and ultimately led to the Fourth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. The Third Amendment was also inspired by the overreach of the British government. Forcing colonists to house British soldiers in their homes infuriated the population. It was inconvenient and costly to the colonists, and many also found it a traumatic experience after events like the Boston Massacre in 1770. The Criminal Justice System Trade and commerce were overly controlled, the British army made its presence known, and the local colonial government was limited by a power far across the Atlantic Ocean. If these affronts to the colonists dignity were not enough to ignite the fires of rebellion, American colonists also had to endure a corrupt justice system. Political protests became a regular occurrence as these realities set in. In 1769, Alexander McDougall was imprisoned for libel when his work To the Betrayed Inhabitants of the City and Colony of New York was published. His imprisonment and the Boston Massacre were just two infamous examples of the measures the British took to crack down on protesters. After six British soldiers were acquitted and two dishonorably discharged for the Boston Massacre- ironically enough, defended by John Adams- the British government changed the rules. From then on, officers accused of any offense in the colonies would be sent to England for trial. This meant that fewer witnesses would be on hand to give their accounts of events and it led to even fewer convictions. To make matters even worse, jury trials were replaced with verdicts and punishments handed down directly by colonial judges. Over time, the colonial authorities lost power over this as well because the judges were known to be chosen, paid, and supervised by the British government. The right to a fair trial by a jury of their peers was no longer possible for many colonists. Grievances That Led to Revolution and the Constitution All of these grievances that colonists had with the British government led to the events of the American Revolution. And many of these grievances directly affected what the founding fathers wrote into the U.S. Constitution. These constitutional rights and principles reflect the hopes of the framers that the new American government would not subject their citizens to the same loss of freedoms that the colonists had experienced under Britains rule.
Thursday, November 21, 2019
It security Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
It security - Case Study Example It largely depends on IT infrastructural resources and assets for the completion of its transactions and operations. The average users of the system include the IT administrators and the staff, most of which posses above average computer literacy. The staff basically requires a computer running on a UNIX platform networked to the company’s server especially those located at the satellite offices across the country. Security policy is the most crucial element of a company’s security program given that it entails all the rules and procedures that must be adhered in order to ensure information security; the integrity, confidentiality and availability of data 1. It is the policy of DechTech Solutions that information, in all forms, is protected from unauthorized modification, destruction or disclosure in order to ensure the integrity, confidentiality and availability of data to all the employees and the and other users. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) alongside the Information Security Officer (ISO) has the primary responsibility for the policy implementation and assuring compliance. They work closely with owners, user management and custodians in development and implementation of the security policies of DechTech Solutions. Their responsibilities include; the provision of basic support for users and systems, ensuring that DechTech Solutions security procedures, policies and standards are in place and are adhered to, the provision of advice to owners in the identification and classification of computer resources, performing security audits, advising system development owners in the implementation of security controls, providing employee security education and providing regular reports DechTech oversight committee on information security. Information owner, the manager responsible for the creation of information and is usually the primary user1, is responsible for authorizing access and assigning
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
World Trade Organization Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words
World Trade Organization - Essay Example As an business community organization, its main focus is set upon creating a uniform set of trade rules between nations that will ensure a smooth, efficient, trustworthy, and assured business transaction among member nations. As an advocate of free and global trade, WTO gives consumers the opportunity to have a greater market for demand and choice of various products as imported from various nation suppliers. The end result, as the organization envisions it, is supposed to be a more balanced, prosperous, peaceful, and accountable economic world. Balance and accountability in the economic world... That statement carries a tremendous weight in the WTO. As such, the organization also functions as a dispute settler among its member countries in relation to their trade agreements. To quote: Trade friction is channelled into the WTO's dispute settlement process where the focus is on interpreting agreements and commitments, and how to ensure that countries' trade policies conform with them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)